Open-access Carlos Chagas Discoveries as a Drop Back to Scientific Construction of Chronic Chagas Heart Disease

Abstract

The scientific construction of chronic Chagas heart disease (CCHD) started in 1910 when Carlos Chagas highlighted the presence of cardiac arrhythmia during physical examination of patients with chronic Chagas disease, and described a case of heart failure associated with myocardial inflammation and nests of parasites at autopsy. He described sudden cardiac death associated with arrhythmias in 1911, and its association with complete AV block detected by Jacquet's polygraph as Chagas reported in 1912. Chagas showed the presence of myocardial fibrosis underlying the clinical picture of CCHD in 1916, he presented a full characterization of the clinical aspects of CCHD in 1922. In 1928, Chagas detected fibrosis of the conductive system, and pointed out the presence of marked cardiomegaly at the chest X-Ray associated with minimal symptomatology. The use of serological reaction to diagnose CCHD was put into clinical practice in 1936, after Chagas' death, which along with the 12-lead ECG, revealed the epidemiological importance of CCHD in 1945. In 1953, the long period between initial infection and appearance of CCHD was established, whereas the annual incidence of CCHD from patients with the indeterminate form of the disease was established in 1956. The use of heart catheterization in 1965, exercise stress testing in 1973, Holter monitoring in 1975, Electrophysiologic testing in 1973, echocardiography in 1975, endomyocardial biopsy in 1981, and Magnetic Resonance Imaging in 1995, added to the fundamental clinical aspects of CCHD as described by Carlos Chagas.

Keywords: Chagas Disease / history; Chagas Cardiomyopathy; Arrhythmias, Cardiac; Heart Failure; Carlos Chagas

Resumo

A construção científica da doença de Chagas crônica (DCC) começou em 1910, quando Carlos Chagas salientou a presença de arritmia cardíaca em exames físicos de pacientes com doença de Chagas crônica, e descreveu um caso de insuficiência cardíaca associada à inflamação do miocárdio e à presença de ninhos de parasitas durante a autópsia. Ele descreveu morte súbita cardíaca associada a arritmias em 1911, e sua associação ao bloqueio AV total detectado com o polígrafo de Jacquet, conforme reportou em 1912. Chagas mostrou a presença de fibrose do miocárdio como subjacente ao quadro clínico da DCC em 1916, e apresentou uma caracterização completa dos aspectos clínicos da DCC em 1922. Em 1928, Chagas detectou fibrose do sistema condutor, e apontou a presença de cardiomegalia acentuada no raio X do tórax, associada a sintomatologia mínima. O uso da reação sorológica no diagnóstico de DCC foi posta em prática clínica em 1936, após a morte de Chagas, e juntamente com o ECG de 12 derivações, revelou a importância epidemiológica da DCC em 1945. Em 1953, ficou comprovado o longo período de tempo entre a infecção inicial e o aparecimento de DCC, enquanto que a incidência anual de DCC na forma indeterminada da doença foi estabelecida em 1956. Os aspectos clínicos fundamentais de DCC descritos por Carlos Chagas foram complementados pelo uso de cateterismo cardíaco em 1965, teste ergométrico em 1973, Holter em 1973, teste eletrofisiológico em 1975, ecocardiografia em 1975, biópsia endomiocárdica em 1981 e ressonância magnética em 1995.

Palavras-chave: Doença de Chagas / história; Cardiomiopatia Chagásica; Arritmias Cardíacas; Insuficiência Cardíaca; Carlos Chagas

Introduction

Chagas disease affects about 6 million people in 21 countries of Latin American, where about 70 million people are at risk of acquiring the disease.1 The disease has been spread throughout the world because of immigration, with a global annual cost of about US 1 billion.2 Chagas disease is caused by the protozoan Trypanosoma cruzi, and is transmitted to humans through the feces of a hemipteran insect. Many years after infection, about 20% of patients develop chronic Chagas heart disease.1 This manuscript presents the history of the scientific construction of this heart disease from its discovery until modern days, emphasizing the main facts that contributed to the expansion of its knowledge over time. We do not allude to its pathophysiology, which is still debatable,3 or treatment aspects because they are not yet fully understood. Only studies published in full were added to the reference list.

Chagas' period of study of the disease (1909-1934)

Carlos Chagas discovered the disease that bears his name in 1909. Details of this fascinating scientific achievement is described elsewhere.4 As early as 1910, Chagas emphasized the importance of the abnormalities in the cardiac rhythm found in some patients with chronic disease. Having into account data obtained in an autopsy case along with clinical findings, he suggested the existence of heart involvement in patients with chronic Chagas disease.5

Chagas emphasized the notorious presence of premature ventricular contractions (PVC) during physical examination, and stressed the presence of AV block, detected by Jacquet's polygraph (Figure 1) since electrocardiogram was not available at that time in Brazil, as a cause of abnormalities in cardiac rhythm. He presented the case of a patient with heart failure who was found to have nests of parasites accompanied by interstitial mononuclear cell infiltration in the myocardium at autopsy.6,7

Figure 1
Original simultaneous jugular venous tracing (A), brachial artery tracing (B), and apexcardiogram (C) obtained with a Jacquet’s polygraph between 1910 and 1914 by Chagas team. Note a transitory second-degree AV block (arrows). The resting ECG was unavailable at that time in Brazil. a: A wave of the jugular pulse; c: C wave of the jugular pulse. Courtesy of Fundo Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, Seção Hospital Evandro Chagas, Acervo Casa de Oswaldo Cruz.

In 1911, Chagas stated that such frequent episodes of arrhythmia on physical examination in individuals under 50 years were not observed outside endemic regions. In addition, he described the case of a patient with frequent PVC on physical examination who died suddenly; at autopsy, nests of parasites surrounded by severe mononuclear cell infiltration were found. Therefore, he suggested that PVC on physical examination could herald sudden death in the cardiac form of the chronic disease.8

In 1912, Chagas highlighted that disturbances in the cardiac conductibility could also be associated with sudden death. Furthermore, Chagas drew attention to a new fact: heart failure was the predominant clinical manifestation of the cardiac form, despite the presence of abnormalities in cardiac rhythm on physical examination. In addition, he pointed out the existence of profound bradycardia in some patients to the point of naming it "slow pulse disease".9 It is outstanding that such a clinical picture - arrhythmias and conduction disturbances in young people - was completely different from the heart diseases known at that time.10

In 1916, Chagas provided new findings on the histological aspects of patients with chronic Chagas heart disease. In addition to having mononuclear cell infiltration, he stated that all patients with this condition had important myocardial interstitial sclerosis (i.e fibrosis). Furthermore, Chagas ascribed the clinical picture of chronic Chagas heart disease- heart failure and arrhythmias- to these underlying myocardial lesions.11

In 1922, Chagas described the clinical characteristics of 62 patients with chronic Chagas heart disease studied from 1910 to 1921. Fifty patients (80%) had concomitant goiter, which might account, at least in part, for the fact that Chagas ascribed the same etiology to both conditions. A recent historical reappraisal suggests a relationship between both conditions.12 Palpitations and dyspnea were the most frequent complaints, and dysrhythmias, cardiac enlargement, and splitting of the second heart sound were frequently detected upon physical examination.

The cause of arrhythmias detected on physical examination by Jacquet's polygraph was PVC in 32 patients (51%), and atrioventricular AV block (second or third degree) in 20 (32%). In a time where serological reaction was not routinely available, such abnormalities in physical examination led Chagas to suggest their presence as a useful tool for the diagnosis of chronic Chagas heart disease. Heart failure was detected in 26 patients (42%). There were 16 deaths (16%); 50% of which were sudden. Of the sudden death cases, four were associated with advanced AV block. Thus, by 1922, Chagas had fully characterized the clinical and the morphological aspects of chronic Chagas heart disease.13

In 1928, with the availability of chest X-ray, Chagas could show a marked enlargement of the cardiac silhouette in a patient with only mild pedal edema, reinforcing the hallmark characteristic of heart failure in areas where the disease was endemic. Furthermore, Chagas provided histological pictures of patients with this condition for the first time, clearly showing the importance of inflammation and fibrosis in the myocardial and conductive tissue in the pathogenesis of chronic Chagas heart disease.14

In 1930, Evandro Chagas (Carlos Chagas' son) suggested the presence of right bundle branch block, which would be frequently diagnosed in patients with chronic Chagas heart disease in the following years, and that this intraventricular conduction disturbance could be associated with unfavorable prognosis in patients with the cardiac form of American Trypanosomiasis.15 Also in 1930, by using a serological reaction to confirm the diagnosis, Villela16 reported several patients with chronic Chagas heart disease in Belo Horizonte, Brazil, which was far from Lassance, the place where Chagas described the disease, thus suggesting that the disease could have a great epidemiological impact.

In 1931, Evandro Chagas documented the relentless progress of chronic Chagas heart disease with the use of the 3-lead ECG and chest X-ray, as Chagas had repeatedly stated based on clinical grounds. In 1934, taking into account the clinical course of the disease together with the histological abnormalities mentioned earlier, Chagas raised the possibility of an autoimmune mechanism in the pathogenesis of chronic Chagas heart disease.17

Thus, by 1934, Chagas had described the clinical picture with its peculiarities, including the presence of cardiac rhythm abnormalities to raise diagnostic suspicion, electrocardiographic abnormalities using Jacquet's polygraph, radiological features, detailed anatomopathological aspects, and possible pathogenetic mechanism of chronic Chagas heart disease. Apart from that, he had also described the etiology, vector, and reservoir of Chagas disease. The relentless progressive characteristic of the disease and its ominous prognosis were also apparent. Undoubtedly, it was the best that a scientist could do at that time.

Forgetting a potential tragedy

In view of Carlos Chagas' work depreciation in Brazil and in Argentina, mainly at the School of Medicine of Rio de Janeiro, Oswaldo Cruz Institute, National Academy of Medicine,4 and Medical and Surgery Society of Rio de Janeiro,18 Chagas disease fell into oblivion of the medical profession following Chagas' death in 1934. It was no longer taught in medical schools.19 As a result, it was rarely diagnosed.20

The chronic phase of the disease started to be routinely diagnosed through serological reactions.21 By 1935, Chagas disease had already been recognized in at least four states of Brazil. In addition, the disease had also been detected in seven countries in Latin America, specially in Argentina.

The disease regains credit in Brazil (1940-1945)

An important point in the construction of the clinical knowledge of chronic Chagas heart disease was the widespread use of the fixation complement test to make the serological diagnosis of the chronic disease. It was first reported by Guerreiro and Machado in 1913, but was considered impractical for widespread use for technical reasons.22 In 1936, Kelser23 modified the original fixation-complement reaction using antigens from artificial cultures of T.cruzi, which made it more stable. This made such reaction be used routinely in the diagnosis of chronic Chagas disease.23 Therefore, based on the clinical picture made up by Carlos Chagas years before, particularly in the presence of severe arrhythmias in young people originated from endemic areas, physicians started suspecting of chronic Chagas heart disease in several parts of Brazil, using either the xenodiagnosis or the serological reaction to confirm the diagnosis of this condition.

The Bambui period (1945-1956)

The Bambui center (Minas Gerais state) greatly contributed to the determination of prevalence, incidence, and clinical course of Chagas disease in a large, unselected population of patients with this condition, by performing a systematic electrocardiographic survey in such patients, thus showing the enormous epidemiological importance of chronic Chagas heart disease.24

In 1945, Dias et al.25 reported the clinical findings of 90 new cases of chronic Chagas heart disease in Bambui. They emphasized the association of permanent splitting of the second heart sound in the pulmonary auscultation focus on physical examination - a sign already described by Chagas - with the presence of right bundle branch block in the resting ECG; lack of pulmonary vessel congestion in the presence of marked cardiomegaly in the chest X-Ray; high prevalence of 1st degree AV block, highlighting its appearance early in the course of the disease and the importance of right bundle branch block observed in the 12-lead ECG for the diagnosis of this condition. Furthermore, they observed a marked left axis deviation of the QRS complex, later on diagnosed as left anterior hemiblock, associated with right bundle branch block. Dias et al.25 also drew attention to the variability of T wave inversion, disappearance of R wave in V4-V6 leads in association with left ventricular apical aneurysm, and the variability of QRS complexes and T waves from one tracing to another in cases of complete AV block.

The intermittence of complete AV block was described by Magalhães and Freire26 in 1945. A case of chronic heart failure with complete AV block complicated by pulmonary infarction was also reported for the first time in this year.27 In 1947, Pellegrino28 reproduced the clinical picture of chronic heart failure associated with the presence of right bundle branch block in the resting ECG of dogs chronically infected with T.cruzi. This fact lent support to the clinical picture described by Chagas and to those who were being reported by other authors at that time.28 In the same year, Rodovalho et al.29 emphasized the concomitance of left and right-sided heart failure in patients with chronic Chagas heart disease.

In 1948, Chiaverini30 reported his experience with 429 inpatients in São Paulo state with chronic heart disease, showing that chronic Chagas heart disease was the most frequent cause of heart disease in that hospital cohort, and that right bundle branch block was found more frequently in patients with this condition.30 Also in 1948, Barros31 observed that patients with chronic Chagas heart disease in the New York Heart Association Class (NYHA) II remained so for one to three years on average, and then progressed to NYHA Class IV, dying in 4 to 8 months on average. That was the first detailed clinical course of patients with chronic heart failure secondary to chronic Chagas heart disease. Barros also drew attention to the importance of hepatomegaly in the diagnosis of right-sided heart failure, which could precede the other physical signs observed in this condition.31

In 1953, Laranja32 pointed out that patients with chronic Chagas disease could remain in the indeterminate form of the disease for a long period, usually 10-15 years, thus providing evidence for the first time that a long time would elapse between the initial infection and the appearance of chronic Chagas heart disease.32 The coronation of the work at Bambui occurred in 1956. Laranja et al.33 presented clinical, epidemiologic, and pathologic data from a cohort of 1340 cases of chronic Chagas disease in which the 12-lead ECG was performed. They showed that 51% of patients presented abnormalities consistent with chronic Chagas heart disease in the resting ECG, thus establishing the prevalence of this condition in a large ambulatory population. Moreover, they showed that about half of chronic patients had the indeterminate form of the disease. Furthermore, Laranja et al.33 showed that out of the 40 patients with the indeterminate form of chronic Chagas disease with known end of the initial infection, 12 patients (30%) developed ECG alterations at 10-year follow-up. Therefore, they set the annual incidence of chronic Chagas heart disease at 3%.33

The sixties

In 1964, based on experimental work, Rosenbaum34 stated that the peculiar electrocardiographic abnormalities observed in patients with chronic Chagas heart disease (right bundle branch block with left axis deviation) were consequence of widespread underlying chronic myocardial lesions. Rosenbaum34 named the left axis deviation as left anterior hemiblock. In 1965, his experience was reported in Brazil in the follow up of 86 patients with chronic Chagas heart disease. Twenty-seven patients (31%) died over a period of 10 years. Brazil observed 18 episodes of sudden death, thus yielding a yearly incidence of sudden death of about 3%. As observed by Chagas years before, complete AV block was the most important cause of sudden death. Thus, Brazil's findings contributed to the knowledge of the clinical course of sudden death due to chronic Chagas heart disease.35

Heart catheterization

A patient with classic clinical, radiological, and electrocardiographic characteristics of this condition, as already reported in detail by the Bambui team, underwent heart catheterization in 1965.36 Mean atrial right pressure was 6 mmHg, right pulmonary systolic pressure 43 mmHg, pulmonary capillary wedge pressure 17 mmHg. This confirmed that chronic Chagas heart disease resembled the so called primary myocardial disease. Puigbó et al.37 studied 12 patients with this condition, but at the early stage of the disease (no heart failure, light or no cardiomegaly on the chest X-ray, but with abnormal resting ECG). Except for slight elevation of left ventricular end-diastolic pressure in 3 patients (25%), hemodynamic data were normal. Nonetheless, at left ventricular angiography, slight left ventricular dilatation was observed in 4 patients (33%), and left ventricular apical abnormalities in 10 (83%).37 This work was very important because it confirmed that a severe disease could occur in patients considered to be in the early stage of chronic Chagas heart disease, as Chagas had highlighted decades before.

The seventies

Refining the noninvasive diagnosis of chronic Chagas heart disease

Echocardiography

With the use of M-mode echocardiogram, it was possible to visualize abnormal heart anatomy and physiology noninvasively. Hernandez-Pieretti et al.38 reported findings obtained from five patients with chronic Chagas heart disease, namely: mitral movement compatible with low blood flow, thinning of the interventricular septum, paradoxical interventricular septal movement, hypokinesia/dyskinesia of the left ventricular posterior wall, dilatation of the left atrium, of the right ventricle, and of the left ventricle.38

One year later, asymptomatic patients showed segmental wall motion abnormalities either in the ventricular septum or in the left ventricular posterior wall, patients with moderate heart failure had abnormalities in interventricular septum contraction (hypokinesia, akinesia or paradoxical septal contraction), left ventricular hypokinesia, and right and/or left ventricular dilatation. In addition to the type of abnormalities mentioned earlier, patients with severe heart failure also had left ventricular systolic dysfunction and increased end-diastolic left ventricular pressure. Therefore, the way to measure the left ventricular systolic function noninvasively was created, which would be paramount in the following years.39

Exercise stress testing

Chagas had fiercely emphasized that many patients with chronic Chagas heart disease experienced sudden cardiac death while working as rural farmers. However, in 1973, Macedo et al.40 failed to reveal abnormalities in the exercise stress testing in patients in the indeterminate form of chronic Chagas disease, thus suggesting that Chagas disease patients with no heart involvement could perform rural work with no additional risk.40 Exercise stress testing, however, showed that work capacity was lower than expected in patients with chronic Chagas heart disease. In those with PVC in resting ECG, exercise stress testing aggravated the severity of such arrhythmias in many patients. Therefore, it became clear that exercise could either elicit or aggravate previous PVC with minimal physical limitation in patients with chronic Chagas disease.41

Holter monitoring

The electrocardiographic monitoring constituted a valuable tool for studying patients with chronic Chagas heart disease, not only in view of the high frequency of sudden cardiac death ascribed to ventricular dysrhythmias and AV conduction disturbances observed in this population, but also because of the intermittence of such abnormalities in patients with this condition. In fact, Hernandez-Pieretti et al.42 observed VPC in 5 of 17 patients (29%), sustained ventricular tachycardia in 3 (18%), 2nd. degree AV block in 2 (12%), complete AV block, and non-sustained ventricular tachycardia in 1 patient (6%).

Electrophysiological study

The introduction of electrophysiological study (EPS) into clinical practice in the late sixties was of enormous practical value for patients with chronic Chagas heart disease in view of the high frequency of bradyarrhythmias and fascicular blocks found in this disease. Benchimol et al. used EPS to diagnose a case of permanent atrial standstill and the presence of sinus node dysfunction in patients with chronic Chagas heart disease.43,44 Another important clinical component of sinus node dysfunction was the syndrome bradycardia-tachycardia, which was diagnosed with the EPS for the first time by Pimenta et al.45 in a patient with chronic Chagas heart disease. In a subsequent paper, Pimenta et al.46 showed that 28% of patients with chronic Chagas heart disease undergoing EPS were found to have abnormal AV nodal function. This highlighted the importance of the potential participation of both sinus node dysfunction and AV nodal dysfunction in the genesis of arrhythmias in patients with this condition.46

The eighties

Acquatella et al.47 first described 64 patients with chronic Chagas heart disease at 2-D echocardiography. They observed a left ventricular apical aneurysm in 46% of patients, including those with the indeterminate form. Therefore, Acquatella et al. opened a window to the in vivo study of the anatomopathological aspects of this disease.47

The appearance of endomyocardial biopsy in the clinical scenario could potentially lead physicians to make morphological observations in vivo, and to pathological changes similar to those already described by Chagas in autopsy material. Mady et al.48 observed edema, slight inflammatory infiltrate, and myocardial fibrosis in patients with the indeterminate form of chronic Chagas disease.48 Subsequently, the same group expanded their findings by studying 42 patients with chronic Chagas disease, 16 with normal ECG and no cardiomegaly at chest X-Ray, 15 with abnormal ECG but normal chest X-Ray, and 11 with abnormalities in the ECG and in the chest X-Ray. They observed that the incidence of myocardial inflammation, myocardial hypertrophy, and myocardial fibrosis was higher in patients with abnormalities in the electrocardiogram as well as in the chest X-Ray. This study, therefore, confirmed the progressive nature of the disease in vivo.49

With the use of radionuclide study, it was also possible to establish the left ventricular ejection fraction noninvasively and to show wall motion abnormalities of the left ventricle, particularly in the infero-apical region.50 In 1985, Espinosa et al.51 provided new insight into the clinical course of patients with chronic Chagas disease, adding new evidence regarding disease progression. Patients with normal resting ECG and SWMA had a survival similar to that found in individuals in control groups; by contrast, those patients with abnormal resting ECG and/or overt heart failure had a poor prognosis in comparison individuals in control groups.51

In 1986, Combellas et al.52 studied patients with chronic Chagas heart disease without heart failure, and showed that patients with this condition were found to have diastolic abnormalities in the M-mode echocardiography. They suggested that such diastolic abnormalities might precede systolic compromise in patients with Chagas heart disease.52 In 1988, Marin-Neto et al.53 showed right ventricular systolic dysfunction in Chagas asymptomatic patients with no other evidence of left ventricular compromise, thus suggesting that the process of myocardial damage starts in the right ventricle in this disease.53

The nineties

With the introduction of statistical methods into clinical practice to determine independent predictors of mortality, outcomes of patients with chronic Chagas heart disease could be better evaluated. In 1991, Espinosa and associates applied the Cox proportional hazard models to predict survival in 66 patients who were evaluated invasively and noninvasively. They demonstrated that systolic blood pressure, atrial fibrillation, cardiomegaly in the chest X-Ray, and the left ventricular end-diastolic pressure determined by left heart catheterization were independent predictors of mortality for patients with this condition.54 Nevertheless, when left ventricular ejection fraction was determined noninvasively by echocardiography, it was found to be the powerful independent predictor of all-cause mortality for patients with chronic Chagas heart disease.55

In those patients with chronic heart failure secondary to chronic Chagas heart disease, left ventricular ejection fraction and VO2 max remained independent predictors of all-cause mortality.56 Ventricular tachycardia induced by exercise stress testing was found to be a predictor of sudden cardiac death in patients with chronic Chagas heart disease, confirming in laboratory the association of malignant ventricular arrhythmia and sudden cardiac death. Independent predictors of sudden cardiac death not associated with physical exercise were established in 1996.57-58

Another important discovery from the nineties was that of the neurohormonal system activation in patients with chronic heart failure secondary to chronic Chagas heart disease. Thus, it was clear that both the Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System59 as well as the Autonomic Nervous System60,61 were overactivated, similarly to what occurred in patients with non-Chagas disease heart failure, thus opening the rationale for the treatment of patients with chronic Chagas heart disease with chronic heart failure.

In 1995, Kalil et al.62 showed a good correlation between Resonance Magnetic Imaging and endomyocardial biopsy to detect underlying myocarditis in patients with chronic Chagas heart disease, thus heralding the potential role of such method in the study of patients with this condition.62 Another important finding obtained in this decade was that prognosis of outpatients with chronic Chagas heart disease was poorer than that of other types of dilated cardiomyopathy.63 In 1999, Rabinovitch et al.64 observed that the rate of recrudescence of malignant ventricular arrhythmia was 85% in patients with chronic Chagas heart disease, survivors of cardiac arrest, treated with implantable cardioverter-defibrillator. Therefore, they demonstrated the mechanism of sudden cardiac death in patients with this condition, in contrast to the role of AV block as a cause of sudden cardiac death at Chagas' time.64

The 2000's

Barros et al.65 showed abnormalities in the isovolumic contraction time in patients with normal ECG, normal chest X-Ray, and normal echocardiogram.65 The same authors also demonstrated right ventricular compromise in patients with otherwise normal echocardiogram.66 Rochitte et al.67 first quantified myocardial fibrosis by Magnetic Resonance Imaging in patients with chronic Chagas heart disease. They observed that myocardial fibrosis was present in 85% of patients with this condition, and that left ventricular ejection fraction was inversely correlated to myocardial fibrosis, thus detecting in vivo what Chagas had detected in postmortem examination. Importantly, they also observed that myocardial fibrosis was present in all patients with ventricular tachycardia, which might suggest a role for the fibrosis in the pathogenesis of malignant arrhythmias in patients with this condition, as observed in non-Chagas patients.67

The timeline of the scientific construction of Chronic Chagas Heart Disease is depicted in Figure 2.

Figure 2
Timeline of scientific construction of the Chronic Chagas Heart Disease. HC: Heart Catheterization; ECHO: Echocardiography; EMB: Endomyocardial Biopsy; MRI: Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

Conclusion

This historical reappraisal shows that Carlos Chagas' discoveries served as a backdrop to the scientific construction of chronic Chagas heart disease, and the scientific evolution that occurred with time added to his work, but, in essence, confirmed his assumptions on this formerly continental tragedy, but now a globalized disease. It is unbelievable that such a discovery did not win a Nobel Prize.68,69

  • Sources of Funding
    There were no external funding sources for this study.
  • Study Association
    This study is not associated with any thesis or dissertation work.

References

  • 1 Chagas disease in Latin America: an epidemiological update based on 2010 estimates. Wkly Epidemiol Rec. 2015;90(6):33-43.
  • 2 Lee BY, Bacon KM, Botazzi ME, Hotez PJ. The economic burden of Chagas disease: a computational simulation model. Lancet Infect Dis. 2013;13(4):342-8.
  • 3 Bestetti RB. Role of parasites in the pathogenesis of Chagas' cardiomyopathy. Lancet. 1996;347(9005):913-4.
  • 4 Bestetti RB, Martins CA, Cardinalli-Neto A. Justice where justice is due: A posthumous Nobel Prize to Carlos Chagas (1879-1934), the discoverer of American Trypanosomiasis (Chagas' disease). Int J Cardiol. 2009;134(1):9-16.
  • 5 Chagas C. Aspecto clínico geral da nova entidade mórbida produzida pelo Schizotrypanum cruzi (Nota Prévia). Brazil-Médico. 1910;24(27):263-5.
  • 6 Chagas C. Nova entidade mórbida do homem. Brazil-Médico. 1910;45:443-7.
  • 7 Vianna G. Contribuição para o estudo da anatomia patológica de Carlos Chagas. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 1911;3:276-94.
  • 8 Chagas C. Nova entidade mórbida do homem. Resumo geral de estudos etiológico e clínico. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 1911;3:3-59.
  • 9 Chagas C. O mal de Chagas. Arch Soc Med Cir S Paulo. 1912;3:34-66.
  • 10 Cabot R. The four common types of heart-disease. J Am Med Assoc. 2014;63(17):1461-9.
  • 11 Chagas C. Processos patogênicos da trypanosomiase americana. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 1916;8:5-35.
  • 12 Bestetti RB, Cardinalli-Neto A, Restini CB, Couto LB. Could Carlos Chagas' assumption on the relationship between goiter and chronic Chagas heart disease be correct? A historical reappraisal. Int J Cardiol. 2016;202:410-2.
  • 13 Chagas C, Villela E. Cardiac form of American. Trypanosomiasis. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 1922;14:5-91
  • 14 Chagas C. Sur les alterations du coeur dans la trypanosomiase americaine (Maladie de Chagas). Arch Mal Couer Vaiss. 1928;21:641-55.
  • 15 Chagas E. Estudo electro-cardiographico da forma cardíaca da trypanosomíase americana. A Folha Médica. 1930; 97(11):113-35.
  • 16 Villela E. Da ocorrência da doença de Chagas nos hospitais de Bello Horizonte e na população de seus arredores. A Folha Medica. 1930;97(11):229-35.
  • 17 Chagas C. Estado atual da trypanosomiase americana. Rev Biol Hig. 1934;2:8-64.
  • 18 Bestetti RB, Cardinalli-Neto A. Dissecting slander and crying for justice: Carlos Chagas and the Nobel Prize of 1921. Int J Cardiol. 2013;168(3):2328-34.
  • 19 Laranja FS. O olhar da cardiologia. Francisco Laranja e as pesquisas sobre a doença de Chagas. Hist cienc saúde-Manguinhos. 2009;16(supl 1):95-114.
  • 20 Couto-Filho M. Lesões do sistema específico do miocárdio num caso de trypanosomiase americana. Hospital (Rio). 1936;8:1223-7.
  • 21 Chagas E. Súmula dos conhecimentos atuais sobre a Trypanosomiasis americana. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 1935;30:387-416.
  • 22 Guerreiro C, Machado A. Da reação de Bordet e Gengou na moléstia de Carlos Chagas como elemento diagnóstico. Brazil - Medico. 1913;27:225-6.
  • 23 Kelser RA. A complement-fixation test for Chagas disease employing an artificial culture antigen. Am J Trop Med. 1936;16:405-15.
  • 24 Dias E. O centro de estudo e profilaxia de moléstia de Chagas em Bambuí, estado de Minas Gerais. (Notícia histórica em homenagem ao Prof. Henrique Aragão). Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 1956;54:309-57.
  • 25 Dias E, Laranja FS, Nobrega G. Doença de Chagas. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 1945;43:495-581.
  • 26 Magalhães BF, Freire AS. Um aspecto electrocardiográfico da doença de Chagas. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 1945;43(2):287-300.
  • 27 Decourt LV, Freitas LP, Romeiro Neto M. Alterações cardíacas na moléstia de Chagas. Rev Hosp Clin Fac Med São Paulo. 1946;1:37-42.
  • 28 Pellegrino J. O eletrocardiograma na doença de Chagas experimental no cão. Brazil - Médico. 1947;61(33-35):299-301.
  • 29 Rodovalho AO, Decourt LV, Dias JC, Ramos Jr J, Tisi OG, Correia IL, et al. Miocardite crônica chagásica. Arq Bras Cardiol. 1948;1:333-9.
  • 30 Chiaverini R. Algumas considerações sobre 429 cardíacos hospitalizados. Rev paul med. 1948;31:303-13.
  • 31 Barros LC. Estudo clínico do aparelho cardiovascular no período terciário da Tripanosomose Americana. Rev Hosp Clin Fac Med São Paulo. 1948;3:155-82.
  • 32 Laranja FS. Aspectos clínicos da moléstia de Chagas. Rev Bras Med. 1953;10(7):482-91.
  • 33 Dias E, Laranja FS, Miranda A, Nobrega G. Chagas' disease: a clinical, epidemiologic, and pathologic study. Circulation. 1956;14(6):1035-60.
  • 34 Rosembaum MB. Chagasic myocardiopathy. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 1964;7:199-225.
  • 35 Brasil A. [Development and prognosis of Chagas' disease]. Arq Bras Cardiol. 1965;18(5):365-80.
  • 36 Massumi RA, Gooch A. Chagas myocarditis. Arch Intern Med. 1965;116(4):531-6.
  • 37 Puigbó JJ, Pisani F, Boccalandrio I, Blanco P, Machado I, Valero JA. Estudio de la cardiopatia chagásica crônica. Empleo de la cineangiografia. Acta Medica Venezolana. 1968;15:339-50.
  • 38 Hernandez-Pieretti O, Goorin-Acosta M, Gallardo-Colina E, Perez-Dias JF, Urbina-Quintana A, Plaja T, et al. La ecocardiografia aplicada al diagnóstico de las miocardiopatias. Signos ecocardiográficos de la miocardiopatia chagásica. Archivos Venezolanos Cardiologia. 1975;2:105-18.
  • 39 Hernandez-Pieretti O. Echocardiographic diagnosis and evaluation of cardiomyopathies: idiopathic hypertrophic subaortic stenosis, Chagas' heart disease and endomyocardial fibrosis. Postgrad Med J. 1977;53(623):533-6.
  • 40 Macedo V, Santos R, Prata A. Prova do esforço na forma indeterminada da doença de Chagas. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop. 1973;7(5):313-7.
  • 41 Hirschhault E, Aparicio JM, Beer N. Estudio sobre la capacidade de trabajo y electrocardiograma de esfuerzo em la miocardiopatia chagásica. Archivos Venezolanos Cardiologia. 1975;2:13-29.
  • 42 Hernández-Pieretti O, Lozano-Wilson JR, Hernándes MI, Lang TW, Quintana AU, Carrasco H, et al. Estúdio de los transtornos del ritmo cardíaco em la miocardiopatia cronica chagásica por médio del electrocardiograma continuo de 10 horas. Acta Medica Venezolana. 1973;20:19-37.
  • 43 Benchimol C, Schlesinger P, Ginefra P, Barbosa-Filho J, Saad EA, Benchimol AB. Parada atrial persistente em paciente com cardiopatia chagásica crônica. Arq Bras Cardiol. 1975;28:221-31.
  • 44 Benchimol CB, Kreuzig R, Ginefra P, Schlesinger P, Benchimol AB. [Diffusion of the sinus node in chronic chagasic cardiopathy]. Arq Bras Cardiol. 1977;30(5):337-44.
  • 45 Pimenta J, Miranda M, Silva LA. [Use of an artificial electrical pacemaker in chronic Chagas' cardiopathy]. Arq Bras Cardiol. 1978;31(4):267-72.
  • 46 Pimenta J, Miranda M, Silva LA. [Demonstration of re-entry in the His-Purkinje system in chronic Chagas' disease. Possible mechanisms of tachyarrhythmia]. Arq Bras Cardiol. 1979;32(1):3-8.
  • 47 Acquatella H, Schiller NB, Puigbó JJ, Giordano H, Suarez JA, Casal H, et al. M-mode and two-dimensional echocardiography in chronic Chagas' heart disease. Circulation. 1980;62(4):787-99.
  • 48 Mady C, Barretto AC, Stolf N, Lopes EA, Dauar D, Wajngarten M, et al. [Endomyocardial biopsy in the indeterminate form of Chagas' disease]. Arq Bras Cardiol. 1981;36(6):387-90.
  • 49 Pereira Barretto AC, Mady C, Arteaga-Fernandez E, Stolf N, Lopes EA, Higuchi ML, et al. Right ventricular endomyocardial biopsy in chronic Chagas' disease. Am Heart J. 1986;111(2):307-12.
  • 50 Arreaza N, Puigbó JJ, Acquatella H, Casal H, Giordano H, Valecillos R, et al. Radionuclide evaluation of left-ventricular function in chronic Chagas cardiomyopathy. J Nucl Med. 1983;24(7):563-7.
  • 51 Espinosa R, Carrasco HA, Belandria F, Fuenmayor AM, Molina C, González R, et al. Life expectancy analysis in patients with Chagas' disease: prognosis after one decade (1973-1983). Int J Cardiol. 1985;8(1):45-56.
  • 52 Combellas I, Puigbo JJ, Acquatella H, Tortoledo F, Gomez JR. Echocardiographic features of impaired left ventricular diastolic function in Chagas's heart disease. Br Heart J. 1985;53(3):298-309.
  • 53 Marin-Neto JA, Marzullo P, Sousa AC, Marcassa C, Maciel BC, Iazigi N, et al. Radionuclide angiographic evidence for early predominant right ventricular involvement in patients with Chagas' disease. Can J Cardiol. 1988;4(5):231-6.
  • 54 Espinosa RA, Pericchi LR, Carrasco HA, Escalante A, Martínez O, González R. Prognostic indicators of chronic chagasic cardiopathy. Int J Cardiol. 1991;30(2):195-202.
  • 55 Bestetti RB, Dalbo CM, Freitas OC, Teno LA, Castilho OT, Oliveira JS. Noninvasive predictors of mortality for patients with Chagas' heart disease: a multivariate stepwise logistic regression study. Cardiology. 1994;84(4-5):261-7.
  • 56 Mady C, Cardoso RH, Barretto AC, da Luz PL, Bellotti G, Pileggi F. Survival and predictors of survival in patients with congestive heart failure due to Chagas' cardiomyopathy. Circulation. 1994;90(6):3098-102.
  • 57 de Paola AA, Gomes JA, Terzian AB, Miyamoto MH, Martinez Fo EE. Ventricular tachycardia during exercise testing as a predictor of sudden death in patients with chronic chagasic cardiomyopathy and ventricular arrhythmias. Br Heart J. 1995;74(3):293-5.
  • 58 Bestetti RB, Dalbo CM, Arruda CA, Correia Filho D, Freitas OC. Predictors of sudden cardiac death for patients with Chagas' disease: a hospital-derived cohort study. Cardiology. 1996;87(6):481-7.
  • 59 Bellabarba G, Davila DF, Torres A, Donis JH, Gonzalez JC, Figueroa O, et al. Plasma renin activity in chagasic patients with and without congestive heart failure. Int J Cardiol. 1994;47(1):5-11.
  • 60 Bestetti RB, Coutinho-Netto J, Staibano L, Pinto LZ, Muccillo G, Oliveira JS. Peripheral and coronary sinus catecholamine levels in patients with severe congestive heart failure due to Chagas' disease. Cardiology.1995;86(3):202-6.
  • 61 Davila DF, Bellabarba G, Hernandez L, Calmon G, Torres A, Donis JH, et al. Plasma norepinephrine, myocardial damage and left ventricular systolic function in Chagas' heart disease. Int J Cardiol. 1995;52(2):145-51.
  • 62 Kalil R, Bocchi EA, Ferreira BM, de Lourdes Higuchi M, Lopes NH, Magalhães AC, et al. [Magnetic resonance imaging in chronic Chagas cardiopathy. Correlation with endomyocardial biopsy findings]. Arq Bras Cardiol. 1995;65(5):413-6.
  • 63 Bestetti RB, Muccillo G. Clinical course of Chagas' heart disease: a comparison with dilated cardiomyopathy. Int J Cardiol. 1997;60(2):187-93.
  • 64 Rabinovich R, Muratore C, Iglesias R, Gonzalez M, Darú V, Valentino M, et al. Time to first shock in implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) patients with Chagas cardiomyopathy. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1999;22(1 Pt 2):202-5.
  • 65 Barros MV, Rocha MO, Ribeiro AL, Machado FS. Doppler tissue imaging to evaluate early myocardium damage in patients with undetermined form of Chagas'disease and normal echocardiogram. Echocardiography. 2001;18(2):131-6.
  • 66 Barros MV, Machado FS, Ribeiro AL, Da Costa Rocha MO. Detection of early right ventricular dysfunction in Chagas' disease using Doppler tissue imaging. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2002;15(10 Pt 2):1197-201.
  • 67 Rochitte CE, Oliveira PF, Andrade JM, Ianni BM, Parga JR, Avila LF, et al. Myocardial delayed enhancement by magnetic resonance imaging in patients with Chagas' disease: a marker of disease severity. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005;46(8):1553-8.
  • 68 Bestetti RB, Couto LB, Cardinalli-Neto A. When a misperception favors a tragedy: Carlos Chagas and the Nobel Prize of 1921. Int J Cardiol. 2013;169(5):327-30.
  • 69 Mesquita ET, Marchese Lde D, Dias DW, Barbeito AB, Gomes JC, Muradas MC, et al. Nobel prizes: contributions to cardiology. Arq Bras Cardiol. 2015;105(2):188-96.

Publication Dates

  • Publication in this collection
    24 May 2016
  • Date of issue
    July 2016

History

  • Received
    26 Jan 2016
  • Reviewed
    23 Feb 2016
  • Accepted
    01 Mar 2016
location_on
Sociedade Brasileira de Cardiologia - SBC Avenida Marechal Câmara, 160, sala: 330, Centro, CEP: 20020-907, (21) 3478-2700 - Rio de Janeiro - RJ - Brazil, Fax: +55 21 3478-2770 - São Paulo - SP - Brazil
E-mail: revista@cardiol.br
rss_feed Acompanhe os números deste periódico no seu leitor de RSS
Acessibilidade / Reportar erro