The theme of violence in nursing theses from the view of technological toolboxes

Marcolino, Emanuella de Castro; Santos, Renata Clemente dos; Menezes, Rejane Maria Paiva de; Miranda, Francisco Arnoldo Nunes de

doi:10.1590/0034-7167-2018-0018

Brasil

home Sumário navigate_before Anterior Atual Seguinte navigate_next

home Sumário

ORIGINAL ARTICLE • Rev. Bras. Enferm. 73 (1) • 2020 • https://doi.org/10.1590/0034-7167-2018-0018 linkcopy

The theme of violence in nursing theses from the view of technological toolboxes

La temática de la violencia en las tesis de enfermería bajo la perspectiva de las cajas de herramientas tecnológicas

Authorship SCIMAGO INSTITUTIONS RANKINGS

ABSTRACT

Objective: To characterize the data gathering technological tools used in nursing theses on violence from the view of “technological toolboxes”.

Method: It is a descriptive and documental study, with a qualitative approach, based on Thesis available in the last ten volumes of the Catalogue of Theses and Dissertations of the Center of Nursing Studies and Research (CEPEn). Documents presenting technological tools during the data gathering of its studies were selected, and then classified using “technological toolboxes” according to Merhy.

Results: 30 theses were selected, data gathering tools were classified in “technological toolboxes” as lightweight, light-hard, and hard technologies, with uniformity in most researches (23; 76.6%).

Conclusion: Given it is a multifaced phenomenon, violence demands a deeper view, using the most diverse tools for its proper understanding and classification.

Descriptors: Violence; Nursing; Research Design; Investigative Techniques; Nursing Research

Thesis	Author	Methodological perspective	Theoretical-methodological references	Data gathering tool^* * I = interview; Q = questionnaire; FG = focus group; Op = participative observation; W = workshops; CM = census map; AT = art-therapy; LH = life history; FJ = field journal; CNR = compulsory notification report; HDC = hermeneutic-dialectic circle;	Toolbox according to Merhy^ L = lightweight technology; LH = light-hard technology; H = hard technology;
T₁	Teixeira AVB.	Qualitative	Conservation Model Theory by Myra Levine	I	L /LD/D
T₂	Lettiere A.	Qualitative	Complex Thinking Theory by Edgar Morin	I	L /LD/D
T₃	Carlos DM.	Qualitative	Complex Thinking Theory by Edgar Morin	I; FG; Op	L /LD/D; L/LD; L/LD
T₄	Barreto ACM.	Qualitative	^* ***** Non-specific thesis.	I	L /LD/D
T₅	Martins CS.	Qualitative	^* ***** Non-specific thesis.	I; Op; CM	L /LD/D; L/LD; LD/D
T₆	Oliveira JC.	Qualitative	Social Theory by Pierre Bourdieu	I	L /LD/D
T₇	Souto, CMRM.	Qualitative	Hermeneutic Theory by Hans-Georg Gadamer	AT	L /LD/D
T₈	Corrêa SA.	Qualitative	^* ***** Non-specific thesis.	I; Q; Op	L /LD/D; LD; L/LD
T₉	Silva LMP.	Qualitative	^* ***** Non-specific thesis.	I; FG; Op	L /LD/D; L/LD; L/LD
T₁₀	Santinon EP.	Qualitative	Social Theory by Pierre Bourdieu	I; Op	L /LH/H; L /LH/H
T₁₁	Okabe I.	Qualitative	Social Theory by Pierre Bourdieu	LH	L/H
T₁₂	Pereira IV.	Qualitative	^* ***** Non-specific thesis.	I; Q	L /LH/H; LH
T₁₃	Fernandes SLSA.	Qualitative	Imaginary Theory by Michel Maffesoli	I; Op; W	L /LH/H; L/LH; L/LH
T₁₄	Araruna RC.	Qualitative	Imaginary Theory by Michel Maffesoli	W	L/LH
T₁₅	Vendruscolo TS.	Qualitative	Cultural Hegemony Theory by Antonio Gramsci	I; Op; FJ	L /LH/H; L/LH; L/LH
T₁₆	Iossi MA.	Qualitative	^* ***** Non-specific thesis.	I; CNR	L /LH/H; LH
T₁₇	Oliveira CC.	Qualitative	Social Theory by Pierre Bourdieu	W	L/LH
T₁₈	Monteiro CFS.	Qualitative	Existentialist Theory by Martin Heidegger	FG	L/LH
T₁₉	Grüdtner DI.	Qualitative	Social Theory by Pierre Bourdieu	I	L /LH/H
T₂₀	Freitas CASL.	Qualitative	Hermeneutic Theory by Hans-Georg Gadamer	HDC	L/LH

Thesis	Author	Methodological perspective	Theoretical-methodological references	Data gathering tool*	Toolbox according to Merhy**
T₂₁	Priotto EMTP	Quantitative	***	Q	LH
T₂₂	Fonseca-Machado MO	Quantitative	***	S	LH
T₂₃	Andrade, CJM.	Mixed	Social Theory by Pierre Bourdieu	I; Q; Op; W	L /LH/H; LH; L/LH; L/LH
T₂₄	Teixeira EMS.	Mixed	Bioecological Theory by Urie Bronfenbrenner	I; Q; Op; PR	L /LH/H; LH; L/LH; H
T₂₅	Gomes NP.	Mixed	Social Representations Theory by Serge Moscovici	I; FWAT	L /LH/H; L
T₂₆	Puccia MIR.	Quantitative	***	I	L /LH/H
T₂₇	Santi LN.	Mixed	***	I; Q; DCR	L /LH/H; LH; LH
T₂₈	Miranda MIF.	Mixed	***	I; Q; Op	L /LH/H; LH; L/LH
T₂₉	Vieira AAB.	Mixed	Social Representations Theory by Serge Moscovici	I	L /LH/H
T₃₀	Flores Sullca T.	Quantitative	***	I	L /LH/H

vertical_align_top file_download show_chart

more_horizclose
- image
- translate
- link
- article
- vertical_align_top
- file_download
- show_chart
- image
- translate
- link
- article

location_on

Associação Brasileira de Enfermagem SGA Norte Quadra 603 Conj. "B" - Av. L2 Norte 70830-102 Brasília, DF, Brasil, Tel.: (55 61) 3226-0653, Fax: (55 61) 3225-4473 - Brasília - DF - Brazil
E-mail: reben@abennacional.org.br

rss_feed Acompanhe os números deste periódico no seu leitor de RSS

Acessibilidade / Reportar erro

[TFN1] Note:

[TFN2] ^*
I = interview; Q = questionnaire; FG = focus group; Op = participative observation; W = workshops; CM = census map; AT = art-therapy; LH = life history; FJ = field journal; CNR = compulsory notification report; HDC = hermeneutic-dialectic circle;

[TFN3] ^**
L = lightweight technology; LH = light-hard technology; H = hard technology;

[TFN4] ^***
Non-specific thesis.