Percentage of occupied area. |
Ratio between the area occupied (with anthropogenic constructions) and the total area of coverage. |
The larger the area effectively occupied, the greater the possibility of potential breeding grounds (vector-host contact) and greater influence on surface temperature (built-up areas). |
Percentage of increase in urban area from 1985 to 2000. |
Ratio between the area occupied in 1985 and 2000. |
Areas of urban expansion may have a greater possibility of vector reproduction due to the difference between urban growth and public investment in sanitation infrastructure. |
Percentage of increase in urban area from 2000 to 2017. |
Ratio between the area occupied in 2000 and 2017. |
Average Altitude of the areas of coverage, in meters. |
Average Altitude, in meters, of each area of coverage. |
Areas with lower altitude have greater possibility of vector reproduction due to higher temperatures when compared with areas with higher altitudes. |
Construction of the areas of coverage, in meters. |
Average of the altimetries of all buildings by area of coverage. |
Areas with greater construction / verticalization have better urban structure, sanitation infrastructure and income, in addition to the built space being unfavorable for the maintenance of vector breeding grounds. |
Percentage of vegetation. |
Ratio of the area occupied by vegetation (exposed soil, arboreal and herbaceous vegetation) to the total of area of coverage. |
Areas with less vegetation are more likely to have potential breeding grounds and vector-host contact, since Aedes aegypti is an urban vector and greater influence on surface temperature. |
Population density per built area. |
Number of inhabitants per km2 of area effectively occupied (with anthropogenic constructions). |
The higher the population density per built area the greater the possibility of vector-host contact. |
Percentage of area with subnormal clusters. |
Ratio of the area occupied by subnormal clusters to the total of area of coverage. |
The larger the area with subnormal clusters, the greater the possibility of vector production due to living conditions. |
Percentage of housings with garbage accumulated in the surroundings. |
Ratio of housings in which the storage and accumulation of waste are in the immediate surroundings, by area of coverage. |
The higher the percentage of housings with garbage is accumulated in the surroundings or thrown in empty lot, the greater the amount of possible foci of vector reproduction. |
Percentage of housings with garbage thrown in empty lots, Rivers and / or ponds. |
Ratio of housings in which the waste is thrown into empty lots or public land (river, lake, or sea), by area of coverage. |
Percentage of housings with open sewer in the surroundings. |
Ratio of housings in which their immediate surroundings have ditch, stream, or a body of water where usually occurs release of domestic sewage, by area of coverage. |
The higher the percentage of housings in these conditions, the lower the investment of the public power in terms of urban infrastructure. |
Percentage of housings without public lighting in the surroundings. |
Ratio of housings in which their immediate surroundings does not have a fixed point (pole) of street lighting, per area of coverage. |
Percentage of housings without paving in the surroundings. |
Ratio of housings in which the stretch of the path where it is located does not have paving (public road with asphalt, cement, cobblestones, stones etc.), by area of coverage. |
Percentage of housings without manhole in the surroundings. |
Ratio of housings in which the immediate surroundings have a manhole or culvert, that is, opening that gives access to underground drainage, through which water from rains, watering etc. flow., by area of coverage. |
The higher the percentage of housings without manholes in the surroundings, the greater the amount of possible foci of vector reproduction due to water accumulation. |
Percentage of housings supplied by well and / or rain stored in Cistern. |
Ratio of housings supplied by well and / or rain stored in cistern, per area of coverage. |
The higher the percentage of housings supplied by well in urban areas, the lower the investment in housing infrastructure. |
Percentage of housings with inadequate sanitary depletion. |
Ratio of housings with exclusive use bathroom and sanitary depletion via rudimentary cesspit, ditch, river, lake, sea or other, by area of coverage. |
Percentage of irregular housings. |
Ratio of housings in irregular occupation (not own, assigned or rented), per area of coverage. |
The higher the percentage of housings in these conditions, the lower the degree of regularization, suggesting lower performance of the public power in the provision of services, configuring worse living conditions. |
Percentage of housings with irregular energy source. |
Ratio of housings with irregular energy supply, per area of coverage. |
Percentage of poor. |
Ratio of housings with monthly income per capita up to a minimum wage, per area of coverage. |
The higher the percentage of housings with low income, the lower the capacity for individual resolution of infrastructure needs. |
Density of poor. |
Housings with monthly income per capita of up to one minimum wage per km2 of built area of a given spatial unit of analysis. |
Indicator that marks the existence of an area with population density with low capacity of individual supply of infrastructure. |
Percentage of self-declared white population. |
Ratio of people self-reported as being of white color/race, per area of coverage. |
It marks a process of territorial occupation where inequality is observed in terms of individual conditions related to income, but also in terms of public investment in infrastructure. |