Open-access Diversity of endophytic fungi in the leaflets and branches of Poincianella pyramidalis, an endemic species of Brazilian tropical dry forest

ABSTRACT

Plants harbour diverse communities of fungal species in their internal compartments. Endophytic fungi help their hosts to establish, survive, and adapt to different environments. Here, we examined the diversity of endophytic fungi in the leaflets and branches of Poincianella pyramidalis, a plant species endemic to the Brazilian tropical dry forest (Caatinga). A total of 360 fragments of leaflets and branches were analysed and 189 endophytic fungi were isolated and distributed among 21 ascomycetous genera based on their ITS and LSU rDNA sequences. Diaporthe was the most frequently identified genus, followed by Didymella and Rhytidhysteron. The colonisation rate of plant fragments was higher in the branches (74 %) than in leaflets (14 %). The richness of the genera of endophytic fungi was also higher in the branches than in leaflets, whereas no difference was observed in endophyte diversity between the plant parts, based on Shannon-Wiener and Fisher alpha diversity indices. Our results indicate that endemic plant species from Brazilian dry forest, such as P. pyramidalis, are predominantly colonised by ascomycetous fungi, especially members of the class Dothideomycetes.

Keywords: Ascomycetous fungi; Caatinga; Diaporthe; Dothideomycetes; taxonomy

Introduction

Endophytic fungi represent a large polyphyletic group of microorganisms that can reside in practically any healthy plant tissue without causing visible infections (Arnold & Herre 2003; Arnold & Lutzoni 2007; Banerjee 2011; Brader et al. 2017; Dastogeer et al. 2017). A single plant can harbour a large variety of endophytes, especially in mature tissues present in the aerial parts of the plant (Arnold 2008; Nisa et al. 2015). This symbiosis between endophytes and their plant hosts can have profound impacts on plant communities and ecosystems, leading to favourable physiological and ecological relationships for environmental balance (Hardoim et al. 2015; Brader et al. 2017). In addition, fungal endophytes can synthesise several bioactive natural products, thereby making them an important biotechnological resource (Bezerra et al. 2012, 2015; Silva et al. 2018; Pádua et al. 2019).

Endophytic diversity can be influenced by plant morphology, chemical and physiological composition, tissue type, seasons, climate conditions, and biogeographical regions (Herrera et al. 2010; Hardoim et al. 2015; Massimo et al. 2015). Most studies have focused on the diversity of endophytic fungi from temperate and humid tropical forests (Arnold & Lutzoni 2007; Banerjee 2011), whereas few studies have estimated the fungal endophyte diversity in tropical dry regions (Bezerra et al. 2012, Bezerra et al. 2017a; b; Dastogeer et al. 2017; Pádua et al. 2019; Silva et al. 2019; Bezerra et al. 2019).

The Caatinga is the largest semiarid tropical ecoregion in South America, occupying an area of 912,529 km² in Brazil (Moro et al. 2016; Silva et al. 2017). Comprising nine ecoregions, this biogeographic domain is dominated by a seasonally dry tropical forest (SDTF) influenced by low rainfall regimes (Silva et al. 2017; Pedrosa et al. 2019). Although the Caatinga presents harsh abiotic conditions (e.g., high temperatures, soil with nutrient deficiency and high salinity), this domain has an adapted biota, endemic plant and animal species, and previously undiscovered microorganisms have been found here in recent years (JC Santos et al. 2011; Silva & Souza 2018).

Poincianella pyramidalis (Fabaceae, Caesalpinioideae) (synonym Caesalpinia pyramidalis) is a plant endemic to the Caatinga which has antimicrobial, antifungal, antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and antinociceptive properties (Cruz et al. 2007; AC Santos et al. 2011; Silva et al. 2015; Chaves et al. 2019). This species is an economically important tree for the production of firewood, fuel, alcohol, and soap. Poincianella pyramidalis easily adapts to different soil types and its populations can grow rapidly, which confers an essential role in the restoration of Caatinga ecosystems (Cabral et al. 2013; Pagotto et al. 2015; Chaves et al. 2016).

Few studies have investigated the association of fungal endophytes with P. pyramidalis, reporting the presence of seven genera (e.g. Colletotrichum, Cladosporium, Phyllosticta, Trichoderma, and Diaporthe), but without the wide taxonomic and diversity analyses of different plant tissues (Gonçalves et al. 2013; Moura et al. 2016; Sena Filho et al. 2016; Souza et al. 2016). Despite the key role of endophytic fungi in the adaptation and evolution of plant species and the maintenance of ecosystem services, limited knowledge is available regarding the diversity of microorganisms associated with endemic plant species of the Caatinga dry forest in Brazil. Thus, we tested the following hypotheses: i) the leaflets and branches of P. pyramidalis harbour a great diversity of endophytic fungi, ii) the communities of fungal endophytes differ between plant tissues, and iii) the fungal richness of P. pyramidalis can contain taxonomic novelties. To verify these hypotheses, the aim of this study was to evaluate the diversity and community structure of endophytic fungi from the leaflets and branches of P. pyramidalis, a species endemic to the Brazilian tropical dry forest (Caatinga).

Materials and methods

Study site

Samples were collected from an area of tropical dry forest (Caatinga) at the Fazenda Tamanduá (07°02'20'' S, 37°26'43'' W), a property belonging to the Mocó Agropecuária Ltda (Cabral et al. 2013), in Paraíba state. This property has an area of about 3,073 ha, of which 900 ha is part of the Private Natural Heritage Reserve of the Caatinga. The site has an average altitude of 240 m, with an average annual rainfall of 600 mm (Silva et al. 2012; Silva et al. 2014). The climate is typical of semiarid tropical regions (Bsh) according to the classification by Köppen (1948). The dominant vegetation is composed of arboreal, xerophilous, woody, and often spiny formations.

Sampling

Healthy leaflets and branches from nine individual trees of P. pyramidalis (Tul.) L. P. Queiroz up to 3 m tall were randomly collected in May 2013 during the dry season in the Caatinga. After collection, the plant material was packed into paper and nylon bags and processed within 48 h. The collection was authorised by the Ministério do Meio Ambiente (MMA)/Instituto Chico Mendes de Conservação da Biodiversidade (ICMBio); permission number: 40331-1/authentication code 87451826 issued on 4 November 2013.

Isolation of fungal endophytes

The plant material was disinfected following the same methodology used by Bezerra et al. (2015). Briefly, the leaflets and branches were first washed in tap water and neutral liquid soap, followed by disinfection using 70 % alcohol for 60 s, 2-2.5 % sodium hypochlorite for 180 s, 70 % ethanol for 30 s, and then washed three times in sterilised distilled water. Thereafter, the leaflets and branches were cut into fragments of approximately 1 cm2. After disinfection, a total of 180 leaflets and 180 branch fragments (20 fragments of each plant tissue from each tree) were prepared. The fragments were transferred into Petri dishes containing potato dextrose agar (PDA) supplemented with chloramphenicol (100 mg/L) and tetracycline (50 mg/L) to inhibit bacterial growth. The plates were incubated at 28 ± 2 °C for up to 30 days. Fungal growth was observed daily, and all colonies were isolated, purified, and preserved in a solution of water and 10 % glycerol for later identification. As a control of surface disinfestation, 1 mL of water from the last wash was transferred to Petri dishes containing PDA medium supplemented with antibiotics and incubated under the same conditions.

Identification of fungal endophytes

Endophytic fungi were identified based on morphology through the observation of macro- and micro-morphological characteristics of the somatic and reproductive structures, and by DNA sequence analysis. Representative endophytic cultures are deposited in the culture collection Micoteca URM Prof. Maria Auxiliadora Cavalcanti (WCDM 604), and prepared microscopic slides in the Herbário URM Pe. Camille Torrend, both at the Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Recife, Brazil.

DNA extraction, PCR amplification, and sequencing

Genomic DNA was extracted from pure cultures using a Wizard® SV Genomic DNA Purification System Extraction Kit (Promega) following the manufacturer's instructions. Two loci were studied, and the primers ITS1/ITS4 (White et al. 1990) and LR0R/LR5 (Vilgalys & Hester 1990; Vilgalys & Sun 1994) were used to amplify part of the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) and nuclear ribosomal small subunit (LSU) regions of the rDNA, respectively. Amplification reactions were performed following the methodology described by Bezerra et al. (2017b). Amplicon purification and sequencing reactions were performed as described by Silva et al. (2019).

Phylogenetic analyses

The sequences obtained were initially compared with corresponding sequences deposited in GenBank using the BLASTn tool, later aligned with selected sequences using the MAFFT v. 6 online interface (Katoh & Toh 2010) and edited in MEGA v. 7 (Kumar et al. 2016). Maximum Likelihood (ML) and Bayesian Inference (BI), and the analyses were performed on the CIPRES Scientific Portal (Miller et al. 2010). For ML analyses, RAxML-HPC BlackBox (8.2.12) (Stamatakis 2008) was used within the GTR+I+G standard nucleotide substitution model. The BI analysis (1 × 106 generations) was performed on MrBayes at the XSEDE (CIPRES) using the nucleotide substitution model generated by the MrBayes 3.1.2 (Ronquist & Huelsenbeck 2003). The models were estimated separately for each gene region (ITS = GTR+I+G and LSU = GTR+G). The obtained trees were visualised using FigTree v.1.4.0 (Rambaut 2012). The DNA sequences generated in this study were deposited in the GenBank database of the NCBI (ITS: MN912308-MN912350 and LSU: MN912266-MN912307, Tab. S1 in material supplementary), and the alignment was deposited in TreeBASE (study ID 25646).

Colonization rate, absolute and relative frequencies

The colonisation rate (TC %) was calculated as the ratio between the number of fungal growth fragments (Nf) and the total number of fragments (Nt) (FI = Nf / Nt × 100) (Araújo et al. 2002). The relative frequency (RF) of isolation was calculated as the ratio between the number of isolates of a species to the total number of isolates (Photita et al. 2001).

Ecological data analyses

The abundance of fungal families among the leaflet and branch samples were compared using the package ‘phyloseq’ (McMurdie & Holmes 2013) and the graph was generated with the ‘ggplot2’ package (Wickham 2016). The Shannon-Wiener diversity index was calculated by the equation H' = -Σ (Pi ln (Pi)), where Pi = ni / N, ni = number of endophytic isolates, and N = total number of endophytic isolates. At the end of the analysis, H' values were converted to Exp (H'). Richness was determined by the number of species in each sample (Shannon & Weaver 1949). Fisher's alpha index was determined by the equation S = α * ln (l + n / α) (Fisher et al. 1943).

Based on the Bray-Curtis distance, permutation multivariate analysis of variance (PERMANOVA) was performed to test whether the endophytic fungal communities differed between plant tissues, and the variation in the composition of the endophytic fungal communities was visualised using non-metric multidimensional scaling (NMDS). Analyses were performed using relative abundance data. Species accumulation curves were determined, and the total richness was compared with the estimated richness using the Chao1 index and Jackknife to evaluate the sampling effort efficiency. For these analyses, we used the 'agricolae' (Mendiburu 2017), 'vegan' (Oksanen et al. 2018), and 'iNEXT' (Hsieh et al. 2016) packages. All statistical analyses were conducted in R v.3.5.0 (R Development Core Team 2018).

Results

A total of 189 endophytic fungi were isolated from 360 leaflet and branch fragments. However, 30 isolates (five from the leaflets and 25 from the branches) did not develop after preservation. The remaining 159 endophytes (137 from branches and 22 from leaflets) were found to be distributed in 16 families in Ascomycota (Figs. 1, 2). The colonisation rate of the plant tissue by the endophytic fungi was higher in the branches (74 %) than in the leaflets (14 %).

Figure 1
Phylogram generated from Bayesian inference (BI) analysis based on a combined LSU and ITS rDNA dataset from endophytic fungi isolated from Poincianella pyramidalis in the Caatinga forest (Brazil) and sequences obtained from GenBank. Posterior probabilities from BI above 0.95 and ML bootstrap support values above 70 % are shown near nodes. The tree was rooted to Earliella scabrosa (URM 7788 and MUCL 45097).

Figure 2
Taxonomic composition of endophytic fungi isolated from leaflet and branch samples of Poincianella pyramidalis in the Caatinga forest, Brazil.

The phylogenetic analyses, based on the sequence combination of ITS and LSU rDNA, consisted of 125 sequences comprising 1779 characters (including gaps). The phylogram grouped the endophytic fungi into 21 genera belonging to 10 orders of Ascomycota (Amphisphaeriales, Botryosphaeriales, Capnodiales, Diaporthales, Eurotiales, Hypocreales, Hysteriales, Kirschsteiniotheliales, Muyocopronales, and Pleosporales) (Fig. 1). Of the 21 genera, 13 (Caatingomyces, Camarographium, Didymella, Epicoccum, Fusarium, Kirschsteiniothelia, Lasiodiplodia, Pseudopithomyces, Phoma, Preussia, Rhytidhysteron, Trichoderma, and Truncatella) were present exclusively in the branches, five (Byssochlamys, Curvularia, Pyrenophora, Muyocopron, and Purpureocillium) were present exclusively in the leaflets, and three (Alternaria, Diaporthe, and Sarocladium) were isolated from both the branch and leaflet tissues. Diaporthe sp. and D. inconspicua were the most frequently identified taxa, and other endophytic fungi were rarely found (fr < 10 %). Overall, 10 taxa (Byssochlamys sp., Curvularia pallescens, Diaporthe miriciae, D. poincianellae, Pyrenophora sp., Kirschsteiniothelia sp., Lasiodiplodia sp., Pseudopithomyces sp., Muyocopron laterale, and Preussia sp.) were recovered only once (Tab 1).

Table 1
Absolute (f) and relative (fr) frequency of endophytic fungi isolated from Poincianella pyramidalis leaflets and branches of Caatinga area.

The genera richness, Shannon-Wiener, and Fisher alpha diversity indices were 6.67, 1.04, and 4.88, respectively (Fig. 3). The accumulation curve of endophytic fungi did not reach stability; however, the Chao1 and Jackknife richness estimated the isolation of 31 and 30 genera, respectively (Fig. 4).

Figure 3
Boxplot indicating the richness (A) and diversity based on Shannon-Wiener (B) and Fisher indices (C) of endophytic fungi isolated from the leaflets and branches of Poincianella pyramidalis in the Caatinga forest, Brazil. Asterisks (*) indicate significantly higher values of the evaluated attribute based on one-way ANOVA. The median (central dot), quartile (box), maximum and minimum (whiskers) are shown.

Figure 4
Genera accumulation curve for endophytic fungi recovered from leaflets and branches of Poincianella pyramidalis in the Caatinga forest, Brazil, showing the observed and estimated richness based on the Chao 1 and Jackknife 1.

Discussion

So far, few studies have analysed the diversity of endophytic fungi from Caesalpinioideae species, including P. pyramidalis (Gonçalves et al. 2013; Moura et al. 2016; Sena Filho et al. 2016; Souza et al. 2016). This endophytic fungal association has been reported by Hilarino et al. (2011) in expanded and unexpanded mature leaves of Bauhinia brevipes; and by Bezerra et al. (2015) in the leaves, stems, sepals, and seeds of Bauhinia forficata in Brazil. Endophytic fungi were also isolated from the bark and stems of Paubrasilia echinata (= Caesalpinia echinata) (Campos et al. 2015). Studies on endophytic fungi associated with P. pyramidalis reported isolates of Colletotrichum, Cladosporium, Phyllosticta, Nodulisporium (Gonçalves et al. 2013), and Paecilomyces (Moura et al. 2016). Trichoderma species isolated as endophytes from P. pyramidalis were used for the treatment and biocontrol of diseases caused by Fusarium in pineapple plantations (Souza et al. 2016), and an important terpenoid with potential anti-cancer effects was reported from the endophyte Diaporthe sp. of P. pyramidalis (Sena Filho et al. 2016).

The high colonisation rate of endophytic fungi in the branches of P. pyramidalis has also been reported in other hosts (Liu et al. 2010; Bezerra et al. 2015; Russo et al. 2016). For example, Liu et al. (2010), studied the branches and leaves of 23 species of evergreen plants in China and 92 % of the recovered endophytic fungi were from the branches. In India, Sunayana et al. (2014) isolated endophytic fungi from Vitex negundo and recovered 143 isolates from bark, twig, and leaf tissues, observing a colonisation rate of 22.22 %, 22.66 %, and 21.33 %, respectively. In northern Thailand, Suwannarach et al. (2012) isolated 2,774 endophytes from the leaves and stems of Cinnamomum bejolghota and reported a colonisation rate varying between 97.8 % and 99.3 % from samples collected during the dry season, and between 94.8 % and 99.7 % from plant material collected during the rainy season. The variation in colonisation rates may be influenced by the differences in plant tissues, endophyte interactions, ecosystems, and the environmental conditions (Suwannarach et al. 2012; Sunayana et al. 2014; Hardoim et al. 2015).

The variability of environmental characteristics observed in the Caatinga may influence the richness and abundance of endophytic fungi in the branches because they last longer than the leaves (see Sun et al. 2011; Sun et al. 2012a). Most of the Caatinga flora is constituted of deciduous vegetation, which is dominated by trees that lose about 70 % of their small leaves during the dry season (Silva et al. 2017). The distribution pattern of the endophytes in the leaves is imbalanced (Cannon & Simmons 2002) and the abundance may vary according to their maturity (Arnold & Herre 2003). For example, plant tissues had a significant effect (15.1 % variation) on the composition of the fungal endophyte community in the twigs and leaves of Betula platyphylla, Quercus liaotungensis, and Ulmus macrocarpa in a mixed forest in China (Sun et al. 2012a), and evergreen plants had a higher incidence of endophytes when compared to deciduous plants (Lau et al. 2013).

Most endophytes found in P. pyramidalis belong to the genera described worldwide as endophytes (Khiralla et al. 2016; Rana et al. 2017; Verekar et al. 2017; Pádua et al. 2019), mainly belonging to Ascomycota in plants from different ecosystems (Arnold & Lutzoni 2007; Gazis & Chaverri 2010; Sunayana et al. 2014; Pádua et al. 2019). Fungal taxa, known as generalist fungi that grow rapidly in non-selective culture media, such as Diaporthe, Colletotrichum, Curvularia, and Fusarium are often found in different tropical plants (Arnold & Lutzoni 2007; Siqueira et al. 2011; Chowdhary & Kaushik 2015; Verekar et al. 2017). Also, some taxa found in this work had low frequency. Similar results showed that most tropical communities had a log-normal pattern distribution and few common rare taxa (Gazis & Chaverri 2010; Hilarino et al. 2011; Bezerra et al. 2013).

One interesting observation from our study was that the endophytes URM 7916 and URM 7917 were isolated from the branches of P. pyramidalis. These endophytic fungi were described as a new genus, Caatingomyces (type species C. brasiliensis), belonging to the family Teratosphaeriaceae (Capnodiales, Dothideomycetes) (Hyde et al. 2019). Teratosphaeriaceae comprises numerous cryptic species that can be defined phylogenetically based on the sequence analyses of ITS and LSU rDNA (Crous et al. 2009; Quaedvlieg et al. 2014). Species belonging to Teratosphaeriaceae are commonly found as phytopathogens; however, Readeriella considenianae has already been reported as endophytic fungi of Eucalyptus grandis × E. camaldulensis in South Africa (Marsberg et al. 2014). Another example is endophyte URM 7802, which was identified as Muyocopron laterale (Hernández-Restrepo et al. 2019) in a genus mainly found as saprobes and plant pathogens (Tibpromma et al. 2016; Hernández-Restrepo et al. 2019), but also as an endophyte (Bills & Polishook 1992, as Mycoleptodiscus atromaculans; Andrioli et al. 2012, as Mycoleptodiscus indicus; Bezerra et al. 2012, as isolate PF108).

The genus Diaporthe is commonly cited as an endophyte and has been found in different plant hosts that inhabit tropical as well as temperate areas. For example, Diaporthe was found as an endophyte in Bauhinia brevipes (Caesalpinioideae) (Hilarino et al. 2011), Cinnamomum bejolghota (Lauraceae) (Suwannarach et al. 2012), Trichilia elegans (Meliaceae) (Rhoden et al. 2012), Delonix regia (Fabaceae) (Zhou et al. 2014), Costus spiralis(Costaceae) (Marson-Ascêncioet al. 2014), and Myracrodruon urundeuva (Anacardiaceae) in Brazil (Pádua et al. 2019). Members of Diaporthe are cosmopolitan and are mainly found as saprobes, phytopathogens, and opportunistic pathogens (Udayanga et al. 2011; Gomes et al. 2013; Dissanayake et al. 2017). Several new species have been described in Diaporthe, including D. pseudoinconspicua and D. poincianellae, that we isolated from the branches of P. pyramidalis (Crous et al. 2018a; b). Additionally, Diaporthe presents species with the capacity to produce enzymes and other secondary metabolites (Maiquel et al. 2016; Yan et al. 2018; Pádua et al. 2019).

Some genera of endophytes reported in this study are commonly found in the leaves and branches of other hosts: species of Diaporthe, Fusarium, Lasiodiplodia, and Trichoderma are found in branches of Theobroma cacao in Brazil (Rubini et al. 2005); Alternaria and Epicoccum have been reported from the branches of Prunus cerasus in the Czech Republic (Hortová & Novotný 2011); Alternaria, Diaporthe, and Fusarium spp. have been reported from branches of Vitex rotundifolia in Taiwan (Yeh & Kirschner 2019); and Diaporthe and Phoma species were registered from the branches of Litsea cubeba in China (Wu et al. 2019). Endophytes from leaflets were mainly found isolates of Diaporthe and Alternaria from Hevea brasiliensis in Brazil (Vaz et al. 2018) and Peru (Gazis & Chaverri 2010); Alternaria, Diaporthe, and Curvularia from leaflets of Prosopis juliflora in India (Srivastava & Anandrao 2015); Byssochlamys, Curvularia, and Alternaria from leaves of Euphorbia prostate, Calotropis procera, and Catharanthus roseus in Sudan (Khiralla et al. 2016); and Sarocladium from leaves of Myracrodruon urundeuva in Brazil (Pádua et al. 2019).

Overall, the genera richness (6.67) and the Shannon-Wiener diversity index (1.04) recovered from P. pyramidalis were lower than those recorded in other studies. Analysing the endophytic mycobiota of Bauhinia forficata, Bezerra et al. (2015) recorded greater species richness (11) and a Shannon-Wiener diversity index of 2.206 in the stems, and Sunayana et al. (2014) recorded a higher Shannon-Wiener diversity index (2.48) in the twigs of Vitex negundo. Evaluating the leaves and stems of Cinnamomum bejolghota, Suwannarach et al. (2012) registered a diversity index varying between 1.598-1.924 in the dry season, and between 2.088-2.305 in the rainy season. Similar results were reported by Sun et al. (2012b), who studied 10 plant hosts from desert areas in China and recorded a low diversity of endophytic fungal communities in the stems and leaves (Shannon index = 0.59 to 1.92, Fisher-α index = 0.82 to 5.68). In the arid regions of northern Australia, Dastogeer et al. (2017) observed the diversity of endophytic fungi in Nicotiana and recorded a high alpha diversity (Shannon-Wiener diversity index (H′) = 2.61 ± 0.17) and a high frequency (60.8 %) of isolation in roots compared to the stem and leaf tissues.

This study of endophytic fungi from the leaflets and branches of P. pyramidalis in the Caatinga dry forest contributes significantly to the existing knowledge regarding fungal diversity. A difference in the endophytic community was observed between plant tissues, dominated by rare taxa. Moreover, the colonisation rate and species richness were higher in the branches than in the leaflets, demonstrating that the fungal endophyte community from P. pyramidalis forms an important and a specific mycobiome. Future studies focusing on the association of endophytes with other plants from dry tropical forests will be important for maintaining the preservation of vegetation cover, and for delineating conservation policies to protect plant hosts and fungal species in their natural environment.

Acknowledgements

We thank the Instituto Fazenda Tamanduá (Tamanduá Farm) for all logistical support provided for the study. We thank the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES, Finance Code 001), the Fundação de Amparo à Ciência e Tecnologia de Pernambuco (FACEPE), and the Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq) for financial support. We also would like to thank Dr. Jarcilene Silva de Almeida Cortez, Isaías de Oliveira Júnior (MSc), and the anonymous reviewers of our manuscript.

References

  • Andrioli WJ, Silva TM, Silva VB, et al 2012. The fungal metabolite eugenitin as additive for Aspergillus niveus glucoamylase activation. Journal of Molecular Catalysis B- Enzymatic 74: 156-161.
  • Araújo WL, Lima AOS, Azevedo JL, Marcon J, Sobral JK, Lacava PT. 2002. Manual: Isolamento de microorganismos endofíticos. Piracicaba, ESALQ.
  • Arnold AE, Herre AE. 2003. Canopy cover and leaf age affect colonization by tropical fungal endophytes: Ecological pattern and process in Theobroma cacao (Malvaceae). Mycologia 95: 388-398.
  • Arnold AE, Lutzoni F. 2007. Diversity and host range of foliar fungal endophytes: are tropical leaves biodiversity hotspots? Ecological Society of America 88: 541-549.
  • Arnold AE. 2008. Endophytic fungi: hidden components of tropical community ecology. In: Schnitzer S, Carson W. (eds.) Tropical Forest Community Ecology. Chichester, West Sussex, UK, Blackwell Scientific Inc. p. 254-271.
  • Banerjee D. 2011. Endophytic fungal diversity and tropical and subtropical plants. Research Journal of Microbiology 6: 54-62.
  • Bezerra JDP, Santos MGS, Svedese VM, et al 2012. Richness of endophytic fungi isolated from Opuntia ficus-indica Mill (Cactaceae) and preliminar screening for enzyme production. World Journal of Microbiology Biotechnology 28: 1989-1995.
  • Bezerra JDP, Santos MGS, Barbosa RN, et al 2013. Fungal endophytes from cactus Cereus jamacaru in Brazilian tropical dry forest: a first study. Symbiosis 60: 53-63.
  • Bezerra JDP, Nascimento CCF, Barbosa RN, et al 2015. Endophytic fungi from medicinal plant Bauhinia forficata: diversity and biotechnological potential. Brazilian Journal of Microbiology 46: 49-57.
  • Bezerra JDP, Sandoval-Denis M, Paiva LM, et al 2017a. New endophytic Toxicocladosporium species from cacti in Brazil, and description of Neocladosporium gen nov. IMA Fungus 8: 77-97.
  • Bezerra JDP, Oliveira RJV, Paiva LM, et al 2017b. Bezerromycetales and Wiesneriomycetales ord nov (class Dothideomycetes), with two novel genera to accommodate endophytic fungi from Brazilian cactus. Mycological Progress 16: 297-309.
  • Bezerra JDP, Pádua APSL, Oliveira TGL, et al 2019. Pseudoplagiostoma myracrodruonis(Pseudoplagiostomataceae, Diaporthales): a new endophytic species from Brazil. Mycological Progress 18: 1329-1339.
  • Bills GF, Polishook JD. 1992. A new species of Mycoleptodiscus from living foliage of Chamaecyparis thyoides Mycotaxon 43: 453-460.
  • Brader G, Compant S, Vescio K, et al 2017. Ecology and genomic insights on plant-pathogenic and nonpathogenic endophytes. Annual Review of Phytopathology 55: 31-323.
  • Cabral GAL, Sampaio EVSB, Cortez JSA. 2013. Estrutura espacial e biomassa da parte aérea em diferentes estádios sucessionais de Caatinga, em Santa Terezinha, Paraíba. Revista Brasileira de Geografia Física 6: 566-574.
  • Campos FF, Sales Junior PA, Romanha AJ, et al 2015. Bioactive endophytic fungi isolated from Caesalpinia echinata Lam (Brazilwood) and identification of beauvericin as a trypanocidal metabolite from Fusarium sp. Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz 110: 65-74.
  • Cannon PF, Simmons CM. 2002. Diversity and host preference of leaf endophytic fungi in the Iwokrama Forest Reserve, Guyana. Mycologia 94: 210-220.
  • Chaves TP, Fernandes FHA, Santana CP, et al 2016. Evaluation of the Interaction between the Poincianella pyramidalis (Tul) LP Queiroz extract and antimicrobials using biological and analytical models. PLOS ONE 11: e0155532. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0155532
    » https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0155532
  • Chaves TP, Medeiros FD, Sousa JMC, et al 2019. Phytochemical characterization and mutagenicity, cytotoxicity, antimicrobial and modulatory activities of Poincianella pyramidalis (Tul) LP Queiroz. Natural Product Research 28: 1-6.
  • Chowdhary K, Kaushik N. 2015. Fungal endophyte diversity and bioactivity in the Indian medicinal plantOcimum sanctumLinn. PLOS ONE 10: e0141444. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0141444
    » https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0141444
  • Crous PW, Summerell BA, Carnegie AJ, Wingfield MJ, Groenewald JZ. 2009. Novel species of Mycosphaerellaceae and Teratosphaeriaceae. Persoonia 23: 119-146.
  • Crous PW, Wingfield MJ, Burgess TI, et al 2018a. Fungal Planet description sheets: 716-784. Persoonia 40: 240-393.
  • Crous PW, Luangsa-ard JJ, Wingfield MJ, et al. 2018b. Fungal Planet description sheets: 785-867. Persoonia 41: 238-417.
  • Cruz MCS, Santos PO, Barbosa JRAM, et al 2007. Antifungal activity of Brazilian medicinal plants involved in popular treatment of mycoses. Journal of Ethnopharmacology 111: 409-412.
  • Dastogeer KMG, Li H, Sivasithamparam K, Jones MGK, Wylie SJ. 2017. Host specificity of endophytic mycobiota of wild Nicotiana plants from arid regions of Northern Australia. Microbial Ecology 75: 74-87.
  • Dissanayake AJ, Phillips AJL, Hyde KD, Yan JY, Li XH. 2017. The current status of species in Diaporthe Mycosphere 8: 1106-1156.
  • Fisher RA, Corbet AS, Williams CB. 1943. The relation between the number of species and the number of individuals in a random sample of an animal population. Journal of Animal Ecology 12: 42-58.
  • Gazis R, Chaverri P. 2010. Diversity of fungal endophytes in leaves and stems of wild rubber trees (Hevea brasiliensis) in Peru. Fungal Ecology 3: 240-254.
  • Gomes RR, Glienke C, Videira SIR, Lombard L, Groenewald JZ, Crous PW. 2013. Diaporthe: a genus of endophytic, saprobic and plant pathogenic fungi. Persoonia 31: 1-41.
  • Gonçalves FJT, Freire FCO, Lima JS. 2013. Fungos endofíticos e seu potencial como produtores de compostos bioativos. Essentia 15: 71-92.
  • Hardoim PR, Overbeek LSV, Berg G, et al 2015. The hidden world within plants: ecological and evolutionary considerations for defining functioning of microbial endophytes. Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews 79: 293-320.
  • Hernández-Restrepo M, Bezerra JDP, Tan YP, et al 2019. Re-evaluation of Mycoleptodiscus species and morphologically similar fungi. Persoonia 4: 205-227.
  • Herrera J, Khidir HH, Eudy DM, et al 2010. Shifting fungal endophyte communities colonizeBouteloua gracilis: effect of host tissue and geographical distribution. Mycologia 102: 1012-1026.
  • Hilarino MPA, Silveira FAO, Oki Y, et al 2011. Distribution of the endophytic fungi Community in leaves of Bauhinia brevipes (Fabaceae). Acta Botanica Brasilica 25: 815-821.
  • Hortová B, Novotný D. 2011. Endophytic fungi in branches of sour cherry trees: a preliminary study. Czech Mycology 63: 77-82.
  • Hsieh TC, Ma KH, Chao A. 2016. iNEXT-package: Interpolation and Extrapolation for Species Diversity. R package version 2.0.12. http://chao.stat.nthu.edu.tw/blog/software-download/ 7 Jan. 2020.
    » http://chao.stat.nthu.edu.tw/blog/software-download/
  • Hyde KD, Tennakoon DS, Jeewon R, et al 2019. Fungal diversity notes 1036-1150: taxonomic and phylogenetic contributions on genera and species of fungal taxa. Fungal Diversity 96: 1-242.
  • Katoh K, Toh H. 2010. Parallelization of the MAFFT multiple sequence alignment program. Bioinformatics 26: 1899-1900.
  • Khiralla A, Mohamed IE, Tzanova T, et al 2016. Endophytic fungi associated with Sudanese medicinal plants show cytotoxic and antibiotic potential. Federation of European Microbiological Societies Microbiology Letters 363: 1-8.
  • Köppen W. 1948. Climatologia: con un estúdio de los climas de la tierra México. México, Fondo de Cultura Econômica.
  • Kumar S, Stecher G, Tamura K. 2016. MEGA7: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis Version 70 for Bigger Datasets. Molecular Biology and Evolution 33: 1870-1874.
  • Lau MK, Arnold AE, Johnson NC. 2013. Factors influencing communities of foliar fungal endophytes in riparian woody plants. Fungal Ecology 6: 365-378.
  • Liu C, Liu T, Yuan F, Gu Y. 2010. Isolating endophytic fungi from evergreen plants and determining their antifungal activities. African Journal of Microbiology Research 4: 2243-2248.
  • Maiquel PP, Thiago CA, Mazutti M, Luis EC. 2016. Bioherbicide based on Diaporthe sp. secondary metabolites in the control of three tough weeds. African Journal of Agricultural Research 11: 4242-4249.
  • Marsberg A, Slippers B, Wingfield MJ, Gryzenhout M. 2014. Endophyte isolations from Syzygium cordatum and a Eucalyptus clone (Myrtaceae) reveal new host and geographical reports for the Mycosphaerellaceae and Teratosphaeriaceae. Australasian Plant Pathology 43: 503-512.
  • Marson‐Ascêncio PG, Ascêncio SD, Aguiar AA, Fiorini A, Pimenta RS. 2014. Chemical assessment and antimicrobial and antioxidant activities of endophytic fungi extracts isolated fromCostus spiralis(Jacq) Roscoe (Costaceae). Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine 2014: 1-10.
  • Massimo NC, Nandi Devan MM, Arendt KR, et al 2015. Fungal endophytes in aboveground tissues of desert plants: infrequent in culture, but highly diverse and distinctive symbionts. Microbial Ecology 70: 61-76.
  • McMurdie PJ, Holmes S. 2013. Phyloseq: an R package for reproducible interactive analysis and graphics of microbiome census data. PLOS ONE 8: e61217. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0061217
    » https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0061217
  • Mendiburu F. 2017. Agricolae tutorial version 1.2-8. http://cran.nexr.com/web/packages/agricolae/vignettes/tutorial.pdf
    » http://cran.nexr.com/web/packages/agricolae/vignettes/tutorial.pdf
  • Miller MA, Pfeiffer W, Schwartz T. 2010. Creating the CIPRES Science Gateway for inference of large phylogenetic trees. New Orleans, Gateway Computing Environments Workshop (GCE).
  • Moro MF, Lughadha EN, Araújo FS, Martins FR. 2016. A phytogeographical metaanalysis of the Semiarid Caatinga Domain in Brazil. The Botanical Review 82: 91-148.
  • Moura LFWG, Oliveira MV, Mota JGSM, et al 2016. Isolamento e identificação de fungos associados às plantas medicinais nativas da Caatinga da região dos Inhamuns, Tauá, Ceará, Brasil. Essentia 17: 43-63.
  • Nisa H, Kamili AN, Nawchoo IA, Shafi S, Shameem N, Bandh SA. 2015. Fungal endophytes as prolific source of phytochemicals and other bioactive natural products: A review. Microbial Pathogenesis 82: 50-59.
  • Oksanen J, Blanchet FG, Friendly M, et al 2018. Community Ecology Package version 25-2. https://cranrprojectorg, https://githubcom/vegandevs/vegan 7 Jan. 2020.
    » https://cranrprojectorg, https://githubcom/vegandevs/vegan
  • Pádua APSL, Freire KTLS, Oliveira TGL, et al 2019. Fungal endophyte diversity in the leaves of the medicinal plantMyracrodruon urundeuvain a Brazilian dry tropical forest and their capacity to produce L-asparaginase. Acta Botanica Brasilica 33: 39-49.
  • Pagotto MA, Roig FA, Ribeiro AS, Lisi CS. 2015. Influence of regional rainfall and Atlantic sea surface temperature on tree-ring growth of Poincianella pyramidalis, semiarid forest from Brazil. Dendrochronologia 35: 14-23.
  • Pedrosa KM, Almeida HA, Ramos MB, Barboza RRD, Lopes SF. 2019. Local representation of change and conservation of a Brazilian Caatinga refuge. Biotemas 32: 105-116.
  • Photita W, Lumyong S, Lumyong P, Hyde KD. 2001. Endophytic fungi of wild banana (Musa acuminata) at Doi Suthep Pui National Park, Thailand. Mycological Research 105: 1508-1513.
  • Quaedvlieg W, Binder M, Groenewald JZ, et al 2014. Introducing the consolidated species concept to resolve species in the Teratosphaeriaceae Persoonia 33: 1-40. doi: 10.3767/003158514X681981
    » https://doi.org/10.3767/003158514X681981
  • Rambaut A. 2012. FigTree version 1.4.0. http://treebioedacuk/software/figtree/ 7 Jan. 2020.
    » http://treebioedacuk/software/figtree/
  • Rana P, Boonchird C, Koirala M, Bhuju DR. 2017. Impact of altitude on the colonization frequency of endophytic fungi isolated from Rhododendron campanulatum D Don of Sagarmatha National Park, Nepal. Journal of Basic and Applied Plant Science 1: 1-5.
  • R Development Core Team. 2018. A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Vienna, Austria, R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
  • Rhoden SA, Garcia A, Rubin Filho CJ, Azavedo JL, Pamphile JA. 2012. Phylogenetic diversity of endophytic leaf fungus isolates from the medicinal tree Trichilia elegans (Meliaceae). Genetics and Molecular Research 11: 2513-2522.
  • Ronquist F, Huelsenbeck JP. 2003. MrBayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics 19: 1572-1574.
  • Rubini MR, Silva-Ribeiro RT, Pomella AWV, et al 2005. Diversity of endophytic fungal community of cacao (Theobroma cacao L.) and biological control of Crinipellis perniciosa, causal agent of Witches' Broom Disease. International Journal of Biological Sciences 1: 24-33.
  • Russo ML, Pelizza SA, Cabello MN, Stenglein SA, Vianna MF, Scorsetti AC. 2016. Endophytic fungi from selected varieties of soybean (Glycine max L. Merr.) and corn (Zea mays L.) grown in an agricultural area of Argentina. Revista Argentina de Microbiología 48: 154-160.
  • Santos JC, Leal IR, Almeida-Cortez JS, Fernandes GW, Tabarelli M. 2011. Caatinga: the scientific negligence experienced by a dry tropical forest. Tropical Conservation Science 4: 276-286.
  • Santos AC, Passos AMPR, Andrade FC, et al 2011. Antinociceptive and anti-inflammatory effects of Caesalpinia pyramidalis in rodents. Brazilian Journal of Pharmacognosy 21: 1077-1083.
  • Sena Filho JG, Quin MB, Spakowicz DJ, et al 2016. Genome of Diaporthe sp. provides insights into the potential inter-phylum transfer of a fungal sesquiterpenoid biosynthetic pathway. Fungal Biology 120: 1050-1063.
  • Shannon CE, Weaver W. 1949. The mathematical theory of communication. Urbana, University of Illinois Press.
  • Silva AC, Souza AF. 2018. Aridity drives plant biogeographical sub regions in the Caatinga, the largest tropical dry forest and woodland block in South America. PLOS ONE 13: e0196130. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0196130
    » https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0196130
  • Silva AV, Neto JD, Francisco PRM. 2014. Estudo da sustentabilidade ecológica em agricultura biodinâmica em região semiárida. Revista Brasileira de Geografia Física 7: 497-512.
  • Silva BLR, Tavares FM, Cortez JSA. 2012. Composição florística do componente herbáceo de uma área de Caatinga - Fazenda Tamanduá, Paraíba, Brasil. Revista de Geografia 29: 54-64.
  • Silva IL, Coelho LCBB, Silva LAO. 2015. Biotechnological potential of the Brazilian Caatinga biome. Advances in Research 5: 1-17.
  • Silva JMC, Leal IR, Tabarelli M. 2017. Caatinga: The largest tropical dry forest region in South America. Switzerland, Springer International Publishing.
  • Silva LF, Freire KTLS, Araújo-Magalhães GR, et al 2018. Penicillium and Talaromyces endophytes from Tillandsia catimbauensis, a bromeliad endemic in the Brazilian tropical dry forest, and their potencial for L-asparaginase production. World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology 34: 1-12.
  • Silva RMF, Oliveira RJV, Bezerra JDP, Bezerra JL, Souza-Motta CM, Silva GA. 2019. Bifusisporella sorghi gen et sp. nov (Magnaporthaceae) to accommodate an endophytic fungus from Brazil. Mycological Progress 18: 847-854.
  • Siqueira VM, Conti R, Araújo JM, Souza-Motta CM. 2011. Endophytic fungi from the medicinal plant Lippia sidoides Cham. and their antimicrobial activity. Symbiosis 53: 89-95.
  • Souza JT, Trocoli RO, Monteiro FP. 2016. Plants from the Caatinga biome harbor endophytic Trichoderma species active in the biocontrol of pineapple fusariosis. Biological Control 94: 25-32.
  • Srivastava A, Anandrao RK. 2015. Antimicrobial potential of fungal endophytes isolated from leaves of Prosopis juliflora (SW.) DC. an important weed. International Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences 7: 128-136.
  • Stamatakis A, Hoover P, Rougemont J. 2008. A rapid bootstrap algorithm for RAxML web-servers. Systematic Biology 57: 758-771.
  • Sun X, Guo LD, Hyde KD. 2011. Community composition of endophytic fungi in Acer truncatum and their role in decomposition. Fungal Diversity 47: 85-95.
  • Sun X, Ding Q, Hyde KD, Guo LD. 2012a. Community structure and preference of endophytic fungi of three woody plants in a mixed forest. Fungal Diversity 5: 624-632.
  • Sun Y, Wang Q, Lu X, Okane I, Kakishima M. 2012b. Endophytic fungal Community in stems and leaves of plants from desert areas in China. Mycological Progress 11: 781-790.
  • Sunayana N, Nalini MS, Sampath Kumara KK, Prakash HS. 2014. Diversity studies on the endophytic fungi of Vitex negundo L. Mycosphere 5: 578-590.
  • Suwannarach N, Bussaban B, Nuangmek W, McKenzie EHC, Hyde KD, Lumyong S. 2012. Diversity of endophytic fungi associated with Cinnamomum bejolghota (Lauraceae) in Northern Thailand. Chiang Mai Journal of Science 39: 389-398.
  • Tibpromma S, McKenzie EHC, Karunarathna SC, Xu J, Hyde KD, Hu DM. 2016. Muyocopron garethjonesii sp. nov. (Muyocopronales, Dothideomycetes) on Pandanus sp. Mycosphere 7: 1480-1489.
  • Udayanga D, Liu X, McKenzie EH, Chukeatirote E, Bahkali AH, Hyde KD. 2011. The genusPhomopsis: biology, applications, species concepts and names of common phytopathogens. Fungal Diversity 50: 189-225.
  • Vaz ABM, Fonseca PLC, Badotti F, et al 2018. A multiscale study of fungal endophyte communities of the foliar endosphere of native rubber trees in Eastern Amazon. Scientific Reports 8: 16151.
  • Verekar SA, Prakash V, Chavan YG, Deshmukh SK. 2017. Isolation, Characterization of Endophytic Fungi of Mimusops elengi (Bakul). Kavaka 48: 21-25.
  • Vilgalys R, Hester M. 1990. Rapid genetic identification and mapping of enzymatically amplified ribosomal DNA from several Cryptococcus species. Journal of Bacteriology 172: 4239-4246.
  • Vilgalys R, Sun BL. 1994. Ancient and recent patterns of geographic speciation in the oyster mushroom Pleurotus revealed by phylogenetic analysis of ribosomal DNA sequences. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science USA 91: 4599-4603.
  • White TJ, Bruns T, Lee S, Taylor L. 1990. Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal RNA genes for phylogenetics. In: Innis MA, Gelfand DH, Sninsky JJ, White TJ. (eds.) PCR Protocols: A Guide to Methods and Applications. San Diego, Academic Press. p. 315-322.
  • Wickham H. 2016. Ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis. New York, NY, Springer-Verlag.
  • Wu F, Yang D, Zhang L, et al 2019. Diversity estimation and antimicrobial activity of culturable endophytic fungi from Litsea cubeba (Lour.) Pers. in China. Forests 10: 1-12.
  • Yan D-H, Li H, Song X, Luo T. 2018. Antifungal activities of volatile secondary metabolites of four Diaporthe strains isolated from Catharanthus roseus Journal of Fungi 4: 65. doi: 10.3390/jof4020065
    » https://doi.org/10.3390/jof4020065
  • Yeh Y-H, Kirschner R. 2019. Diversity of endophytic fungi of the coastal plant Vitex rotundifolia in Taiwan. Microbes and Environments 34: 59-63.
  • Zhou Z, Zhang C, Zhou W, et al 2014. Diversity and plant growth-promoting ability of endophytic fungi from the five flower plant species collected from Yunnan, Southwest China. Journal of Plant Interactions 9: 585-591.

Publication Dates

  • Publication in this collection
    22 Mar 2021
  • Date of issue
    Oct-Dec 2020

History

  • Received
    30 May 2020
  • Accepted
    13 Sept 2020
location_on
Sociedade Botânica do Brasil SCLN 307 - Bloco B - Sala 218 - Ed. Constrol Center Asa Norte CEP: 70746-520 Brasília/DF. - Alta Floresta - MT - Brazil
E-mail: acta@botanica.org.br
rss_feed Acompanhe os números deste periódico no seu leitor de RSS
Acessibilidade / Reportar erro